site redesign!
so what do y'all think? with our new venture i felt it was time to shake things up a bit. i went darker, rounder and actually much easier to work with.
the code that makes up the template of each page has been completely rewritten to make it much easier to develop new (non-blog) pages. in addition, many more links both within our site and to other emerging churches have been added. i've clicked just about every link on every page, but if you see something, let me know.
so what are your impressions? and how did this evening's service go?
-jason
the code that makes up the template of each page has been completely rewritten to make it much easier to develop new (non-blog) pages. in addition, many more links both within our site and to other emerging churches have been added. i've clicked just about every link on every page, but if you see something, let me know.
so what are your impressions? and how did this evening's service go?
-jason
3 Comments:
wow, jason. you rocked the house on this one! the service tonight went well. okay, some rough patches (we sure missed your tech wizardry), but god was so IN IT, and people were so receptive, and we learned a lot (andy is writing up a slew of notes to post soon).
what can i say but alleluia? there's life at the crossing, indeed.
rosanne-
Those are actually archived copies of pages (the "previous" links that you're talking about). For the sake of space preservation, I've intentionally kept the images off of them unless the post itself contains an image. You'll also notice that the "rounding" of the text boxes is stripped out. It is intentional, however I'll play with the style-sheet and see if I can add them back in without too much overhead.
-jason
Ok, I actually just tweaked the stylesheet for the entire site, now the images should work on even the oldest archive, without any additional disk usage for the archives.
Try it now and tell me if it works.
-jason
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home